Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Shodhshauryam: International Scientific Refereed Research Journal (SHISRRJ) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against publication malpractice. The journal follows the principles and best practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and other internationally recognized publishing bodies.

This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

Authors submitting manuscripts to SHISRRJ are expected to adhere to the following ethical standards:

Originality and Plagiarism

  • Submitted work must be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere

  • Proper citation and acknowledgment of all sources are mandatory

  • All manuscripts are subject to plagiarism detection using standard screening tools

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

  • Authors must not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously

  • Redundant or duplicate publication is considered unethical and unacceptable

Authorship and Contributorship

  • Authorship should reflect significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study

  • All listed authors must approve the final version of the manuscript

  • Any changes to authorship after submission must be justified and approved by all authors

Data Accuracy and Research Integrity

  • Authors are responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the data presented

  • Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting of data is strictly prohibited

  • Authors should be prepared to provide raw data if requested

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

  • Research involving human participants or animals must comply with institutional, national, and international ethical standards

  • Authors must state that ethical approval and informed consent were obtained where applicable

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

  • Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that could influence the research

  • All sources of funding must be clearly acknowledged

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors

Editors are responsible for:

  • Making publication decisions based solely on academic merit, originality, and relevance

  • Ensuring a fair, unbiased, and confidential review process

  • Maintaining editorial independence from commercial or institutional influence

  • Taking appropriate action in cases of suspected misconduct

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Conduct reviews objectively, constructively, and within the agreed timeframe

  • Maintain strict confidentiality of submitted manuscripts

  • Declare any conflicts of interest

  • Refrain from using unpublished material for personal advantage

Handling of Misconduct

SHISRRJ takes allegations of misconduct seriously. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Plagiarism

  • Data fabrication or falsification

  • Citation manipulation

  • Authorship disputes

In cases of suspected misconduct:

  • The matter will be investigated following COPE guidelines

  • Authors may be asked to provide explanations or supporting documentation

  • Outcomes may include correction, retraction, or rejection of the manuscript

Retractions and Corrections

  • Articles may be retracted in cases of proven misconduct or serious errors

  • Corrections or errata will be issued where necessary to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record

Complaints and Appeals

Complaints related to editorial decisions, peer review, or ethical concerns may be submitted formally to the Editorial Office. Each complaint will be reviewed fairly, transparently, and in confidence.